After months of investigation and data collection, a trial to determine the legality of Minnesota’s current sex offender reform program has finally begun.
Attorneys for both sides issued opening statements Monday in a trial that is expected to last several weeks. Dan Gustafson, the attorney representing more than 700 sex offenders in the civil commitment program, issued a strong challenge of the current system, asking Judge Donovan Frank to rule the program unconstitutional. Gusatson noted that only one individual has ever completed the program, which showcases that the current rehabilitation system is failing.
Conversely, Deputy Minnesota Attorney General Nathan Brennaman argued that the program did not infringe the rights of the offenders. He believes the program is constitutional, and he noted that an unconstitutional ruling could jeopardize the safety of Minnesotans by placing many former offenders back on the streets.
Whatever is decided, it’s clear that some changes are needed. Imagine if you had a graduating class of 700 individuals, and even though you went to class and received good grades, only the valedictorian was allowed to graduate. Certainly nobody would argue that the school program was working. On a smaller scale, a similar ideology can be applied to the sex offender program. Individuals who serve their time, receive clearing from mental health experts, show remorse, have made positive strides in their life, are unlikely to re-offend and who are monitored after their release are certainly deserving of a second chance. They shouldn’t be forced to wallow in a purgatory-like state for years and years.
Although he may not rule it unconstitutional, it seems likely that Judge Frank will order that the program undergo a few changes. As he wrote in a 75-page report, Frank said the current structure has “grave deficiencies” and needs sweeping changes. We’ll keep tabs on the case as it continues over the next few weeks.
Related source: Pioneer Press
